Before Pacquiao Cotto: How Many of Manny’s Championships are Legitimate
Published: Nov 09 2009 by: Scott Levinson
Manny Pacquiao has claims to six world championships, but how many are legit?
Manny Pacquiao has won titles in six different weight classes (some incorrectly say five), but which ones are legitimate? Who can really sort through the muddled alphabet-soup mess? Well actually, even in the murky confusion, we can often determine a real championship from a spurious title. We must try to establish the differences in quality among the alphabet straps, or even when a fighter is “World Champion” despite being unrecognized as such by the sanctioning bodies. And we must do this “as we go” since the landscape is always changing.
Now with the influx of interim, regular, and super champions, I defy anyone to keep track of it all. A casual fan feels lost and referring to these organizations for clarity will only make it worse. Boxing insiders must rise above it, and develop a consensus and reality that might sometimes exclude the sanctioning bodies.
We cannot withhold World Championship status to a fighter in lieu of title unification, given the impossible obligations that would now entail, the absurd practice of having multiple divisional titlists even within one organization, the politics, and the unwillingness of these groups to work together. We collectively must find a new way, an essence of clarity and truth, and shun those who try to cloud it while supporting those who champion it.
Let’s look at Pacquiao’s championships and see if we can’t determine which ones were legit and which ones were not.
WBC Flyweight Champion (1998-1999)
In December of ’98, Manny knocked out Thai Chatchai Sasakul in eight rounds to win the WBC Flyweight Title. Sasakul, 33-1, was in his third defense after winning the title from Yuri Arbachakov, a prodigious talent, and perhaps the top flyweight of the 90’s. At the time Sasakul relieved him of his belt, Yuri was the recognized #1 guy, undefeated and in his 11th defense. By “beating the guy that beat the guy,” Pacquiao became “the guy.” His claim as former Flyweight Champion cannot really be challenged on the grounds of merit.
Verdict: Legitimate

IBF Super Bantamweight Champion (2001-03)
After losing his flyweight title, he immediately leapfrogged the 115 and 118 lb. classes to fight at 122. After a “reign” as WBC International Super Bantamweight Champion, he knocked out Lehlo Ledwaba to become IBF Super Bantamweight Champion. Ledwaba, 33-1-1 and in his sixth defense, was a splendid fighter, a classy and talented practitioner with an almost-irrefutable claim as being the #1 guy at junior featherweight. By the time this fight happened, Marco Antonio Barrera and Erik Morales had left the division. Their alphabet soup replacements were simply not on Ledwaba’s level.
Verdict: Legitimate
Ring Magazine/Universally Recognized Featherweight Champion (2003-05)
Here we have a situation where we are forced to virtually ignore the sanctioning bodies. In November of ’03, Pacquiao stopped Barrera in 11 rounds. No official title was at stake, but Barrera was the Ring Magazine Featherweight Champion at the time. He first cemented his status by beating #1 Naseem Hamed. Barrera further locked in his position as World Featherweight Champion by exacting revenge against WBC Champion Erik Morales, but he refused the belt. Good enough? I would say so.
We don’t need nor should we require the sanctioning bodies to cosign on what we already know to be true. If they want to get on board, fine, but if not, we must defer to a higher order of reasoning. There is virtually no way one could coherently debate Barrera’s (and therefore Pacquiao’s) championship legitimacy at this weight.
Verdict: Legitimate
WBC Super Featherweight Champion (2008)
Again, we have an alarming gap in reality as we know it compared to the often times Bizarro World of the sanctioning bodies. Why did it take until 2008 before Manny was crowned at junior lightweight by a major sanctioning body? His run at 130 began with his last loss, to Erik Morales in March of ‘05. By the end of ’06, however, he had stopped Morales twice in rematches and was the clear-cut #1 guy. Who else was there? Barrera? Well, he had already lost to Pacquiao before. Marquez? He was still at 126. Manny went on to beat Barrera again at 130, but still had to beat Marquez before getting a major belt. Whatever. He was the best junior lightweight in the world from ’06-’08, hands down.
Verdict: Legitimate
WBC Lightweight Champion (2008)
Nowadays we often hear the term “strap-holder,” which indicates a fighter who holds a belt from a major sanctioning body, but whose claim as World Champion is shaky at best. David Diaz, outclassed by Manny is nine rounds, was a strap-holder. He won the “interim WBC title” when he beat Jose Armando Santa Cruz, and later was named the organization’s champion when “regular” champion Joel Casamayor was stripped. Not exactly spine-tingling stuff.
Pacquiao needed to beat Casamayor to have become the real lightweight champion .You could almost make a case for unified titlist, Nate Campbell, but nobody thought of Diaz as the real lightweight champion. You can argue Casamayor benefited from a robbery against Santa Cruz, who Diaz stopped or that Casamayor was about to lose to Marquez, who Pacquiao beat, therefore Manny was the legitimate champion. You could argue that. And you would lose that argument.
Verdict: Illegitimate
World Junior Welterweight Champion (2009)
In today’s age, it doesn’t get more clear-cut than this. What the alphabet organizations have to say about it is almost irrelevant. I don’t know, nor do I care. Ricky Hatton was the Undisputed Junior Welterweight Champion, a distinction he had enjoyed since deposing Kostya Tszyu. By beating Hatton, Pacquiao became, and is still the recognized champion at 140. If his first bout after Cotto does not get made at 140, however, he would rightfully lose that recognition.
Verdict: Legitimate
Let’s Add It All Up! (The Final Verdict)
As of this writing, Manny has won titles in six different weight classes, five of which are legitimate championships. It’s nothing short of ridiculous to deny him his due at featherweight based on sanctioning body technicalities and maneuverings, a fact overlooked by many in the media when summarizing Pacquiao’s accomplishments.
Nevertheless, what Manny has accomplished is a staggering feat, only achievable by fighting the best, which Manny has done in almost every division he has been in. On Saturday, he goes for an unheard-of title in his seventh weight class. Would it be his sixth legitimate championship if he wins? Well, the catch-weight component, as well as the divisional presence of Shane Mosley and Floyd Mayweather makes that highly debatable. But it would be a good start.
Be sure to keep checking in with ProBoxing-Fans.com for continued coverage on everything related to Pacquiao vs. Cotto. You can take a look at our Pacquiao vs. Cotto preview and prediction and then on the night of the fight check in for Pacquiao Cotto results.
Photo Credit: Mike Gonzalez / Creative Commons 3.0 License












From 1995 to 1997, he fought 20 non-title bouts against bigger opponents with one KO loss, with his still growing teenager-body frame, weighing 98 lbs and putting metals in his pocket so he can make the weight (106 lb), and saying he was 18 years old, the minimum age allowed.
He could have 10 belts from 105 lb – 140 lb !. (1997 – 2009), involving all the alphabet soup of boxing organizations:
1. 105 / 106 lb (47.6 kg) – Minimumweight (also @ 106 lb),
2. 108 lb (49.0 kg) – Light flyweight,
3. 112 lb (50.8 kg) - Flyweight,
4. 115 lb (52.2 kg) - Super flyweight,
5. 118 lb (53.5 kg) – Bantamweight,
6. 122 lb (55.3 kg) – Super bantamweight,
7. 126 lb (57.2 kg) - Featherweight,
8. 130 lb (59.0 kg) - Super featherweight,
9. 135 lb (61.2 kg) – Lightweight,
10. 140 lb (63.5 kg) – Super lightweight;
Consider yourself lucky analyzing only 6 titles instead of 10.
Even before the Cotto fight on November 14, which is inside the
141 – 147 lb (66.7 kg) – Welterweight.
Thank you all for your replies.
What is a legitimate championship? I look at it as if you can only have one “real” champion of the world. The term itself does not lend itself well to muliplicity.
Sometimes it’s linear and clean-cut, other times it requires discretion to determine what is legitimate. The linear chain has been so fractured by the sanctioning bodies, it’s impossible to determine in most weight classes. Legitimate means rightful champion, the clear #1 guy linearly or by other reasonable means, the difference between Wladamir Klitschko and Nikolay Valuev.
Would Pacquiao have cleaned out 135 if he chose to? Of course. But he didn’t. Again, how many “champions of the world” can there theoretically be? He should just leapfrog Casamayor and Campbell based on perception? I am in no way belittling the accomplishment or David Diaz, and I have no problem calling Pacquiao a former lightweight titlist. 5 out of 6 is pretty good, better than not only Oscar and Floyd, but any fighter in history.
Hope you enjoyed the piece. Cheers-Scott
Yes… it’s the difference between a “championship” and a “title”.
Compare his belts to Floyd Mayweather Jr.’s:
1) WBC Jr. Middleweight from DLH = illegitimate
(is anyone going to argue Oscar is the best at jr. middleweight by beating Mayorga?)
2) Undisputed Welterweight belt from Baldomir = sadly, legitimate
3) WBC Jr. Welterweight from Gatti = illegitimate
4) WBC Lightweight from Castillo I = illegitimate (cmon we know he lost the first fight)
5) WBC Jr. Lightweight from Hernandez = legitimate
To think about it DLH’s belt lineage are much worse.
Why is David Diaz “illegitimate”? He had the most prestigious (arguably) WBC belt and was unbeaten by any of the so-called “legitimates”. If Casamayor or Nate wanted him, for sure they would have arranged for that long before Pacquiao faced him. But they didn’t because he was and is like a Clottey in the 135 lb. division = too dangerous and not enough monetary return.
As for the Ring Magazine belt, yes, it was very prestigious when it first started. But politics kicked into it long before GBP acquired it and made it more political. I’d rather have the WBC belt than one from a magazine’s. Greatest example is their last P4P list, how can a boxer who retired 18 months ago and not have faced anybody significant for the last 5 years in his own division be in that list, and worse, at the top? Most if not all boxers can beat another boxer two divisions down in a very convincing manner. But is that boxer a real champion?
To use the word legitimate and illegitimate is improper. Tell WBC that its WBC lightweight title is illegitimate and you will be sued.
scott levinson is brutally massacred here..and that’s legitimate
Come to think of it, If Pacquiao spent time cleaning up the Lightweight division fighting the Casamayors and Diazs of this world, we may not had the chance see the dela Hoya, Hatton and Cotto fights. Even Manny has said that there’s probably a fight or two left in him, Legitimate or not, let’s just sit back and enjoy the show that is Manny Pacquiao, the modern day Henry Armstrong.
Can you firmly say that Pacquiao will not win against Casamayor or Campbell if he fought them? If you can say that without a doubt then his win over Diaz is nothing. But for me I firmly believe that he can beat any of those guys hands down. Therefore his WBC lightweight title is legit.
i have a question for u scott….how can pacquiao get the lineal welterweight belt?? whos who he gonna fight?? is it mayweather?? if im not mistaken mayweather had the lineal belt b4 he retired
Hey Scott! See how stupid your analysis is? Got fired from your very poor analysis of Pacman’s great achievement!