<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Froch vs. Dirrell Preview &amp; Prediction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.proboxing-fans.com/froch-vs-dirrell-preview-prediction_100109/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.proboxing-fans.com/froch-vs-dirrell-preview-prediction_100109/</link>
	<description>The best boxing news on the web today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:55:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisH</title>
		<link>http://www.proboxing-fans.com/froch-vs-dirrell-preview-prediction_100109/comment-page-1/#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proboxing-fans.com/?p=729#comment-318</guid>
		<description>You made a good case for Froch a poor case for Dirrell and then picked Dirrell anyway.  You should have learnt from the Taylor fight not to pick against Froch but obviously you need another lesson!    Dirrell  has only been in with guys who were much smaller that he could keep on the end of his jab. The exception to this was Hanshaw who didn&#039;t possess the same power as Froch.  If he had, Dirrell wouldn&#039;t have made it out of the first round when Hanshaw had him down.  Froch will break Dirrell within 10 rounds, you can count on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You made a good case for Froch a poor case for Dirrell and then picked Dirrell anyway.  You should have learnt from the Taylor fight not to pick against Froch but obviously you need another lesson!    Dirrell  has only been in with guys who were much smaller that he could keep on the end of his jab. The exception to this was Hanshaw who didn&#8217;t possess the same power as Froch.  If he had, Dirrell wouldn&#8217;t have made it out of the first round when Hanshaw had him down.  Froch will break Dirrell within 10 rounds, you can count on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.proboxing-fans.com/froch-vs-dirrell-preview-prediction_100109/comment-page-1/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 01:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proboxing-fans.com/?p=729#comment-253</guid>
		<description>Why can&#039;t you see that happening Chris?

Taylor did it for 11 rounds.  Dirrell is far more slick than Taylor.  

As for home &quot;court&quot; advantage.  I don&#039;t really think much of it.  
Perhaps Froch gets the benefit of the doubt on an extra round from the judges but I think if this fight goes the distance, it&#039;s Dirrell&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can&#8217;t you see that happening Chris?</p>
<p>Taylor did it for 11 rounds.  Dirrell is far more slick than Taylor.  </p>
<p>As for home &#8220;court&#8221; advantage.  I don&#8217;t really think much of it.<br />
Perhaps Froch gets the benefit of the doubt on an extra round from the judges but I think if this fight goes the distance, it&#8217;s Dirrell&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.proboxing-fans.com/froch-vs-dirrell-preview-prediction_100109/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 07:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proboxing-fans.com/?p=729#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Home court advantage and the fact that to take away a champions title you have to be the clear victor.  I&#039;m struggling to see how Dirrell will do that by pot-shotting and running, unless he decides to grow a pair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Home court advantage and the fact that to take away a champions title you have to be the clear victor.  I&#8217;m struggling to see how Dirrell will do that by pot-shotting and running, unless he decides to grow a pair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.proboxing-fans.com/froch-vs-dirrell-preview-prediction_100109/comment-page-1/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 03:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proboxing-fans.com/?p=729#comment-104</guid>
		<description>Froch will KO or TKO Dirrell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Froch will KO or TKO Dirrell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://www.proboxing-fans.com/froch-vs-dirrell-preview-prediction_100109/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proboxing-fans.com/?p=729#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Carl by decision. You are underestimating the home court advantage. This is important in tennis, football and ESPECIALLY boxing.
Gareth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl by decision. You are underestimating the home court advantage. This is important in tennis, football and ESPECIALLY boxing.<br />
Gareth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 1/9 queries in 0.019 seconds using disk
Object Caching 365/369 objects using disk

Served from: www.proboxing-fans.com @ 2012-02-10 23:24:54 -->
