anyways, back to your article. it’s quite interesting really. looking forward to how this will go. no hatred here people. wait til you see the last of the series, then you comment.

Manny Peak v Naseem Peak, again his punching power would be way to make for Manny and another early KO, lets be honest the fighter that face barrera was a man that didnt care who half assed trained. If you are looking at ability and natural gift which both men have alot of. But Manny defence is shit and PBF will expose him he drops his hands way to often and Naseem was a one punch KO artist he only needs a punch and its lights out

This is my honest analysis on that fight (FM vs MP).

I must admit that floyd has a slight edge in speed and defense(he’s great on this). But no one knows yet who’s better between the two until the fight happens.

His article is not worthy to consider. It only benefits from the hits it collects nothing more.

I’ll make again my own opinion on your Part 2,3 etc. That is if you’d courageous enough to continue.

The point here is: IF THIS AUTHOR BELITTLES ONE GREAT FIGHTER’S ACHIEVEMENTS OF TODAY HE ALSO BELITTLES ALL OTHER GREAT FIGHTERS OF TODAY (NOT JUST ONE).

Similarly, if one writer or so called boxing expert questions the belts of one multi-belted champion (like pacman), it should follow that he should also question the belts of other multi-belted champions. If you attempt not to consider pacman’s other belts then you are also obliged not to consider the other belts of other multi-belted fighters from the seventies onwards by also analysing the belts’ legitimacy of those other champions becoz those belts were much more questionable than pacman’s.

My honest opinion is that when one reviews the tapes of those champions in the distant past it would reveal that their techniques and the so-called boxing science was very bad. The champions of today could easily exploit the weaknesses in the pasffighters’ armours becoz those fighters could only be compared to the amateurs of today with about 200 fight amateur records while still remaining as amateurs (e.g., shawn porter w/ about 150 approx. amat.fights)

I’ve reviewed Henry Armstrong(one of the greatests ever) fights on the tape and was convinced that Armstrong fights almost exactly the same of Ricky Hatton. That’s just an example that an athlete of today’s generation cannot be compared less than those in the past. As a proof — OLYMPIC (WORLD) RECORDS OF TODAY CAN NEVER BE BROKEN BY SOMEONE’S RECORDS IN THE PAST. FIGHT RECORDS IN THE PAST WERE JUST A BIT COMPARABLE TO AMATEUR RECORDS OF TODAY !!!